Welcome Page Up Evaluating CW. Initial Reponse COB responds! Authors' Response A Rationale. Patristic Evidence. Unproven! Rational? It's more complex. Even more complex. Emotion. Modern Mission Baby Brooklyn. (God)parents? Baptise or What? Atheistic / Agnostic? Unmarried? Occasional Offices.
| |
| Not having seen Bishop Buchanan’s
reply,
the originating authors responded only to the correspondence
|
|
“We are grateful for the
contribution of
your correspondents to the discussion on the use of the new baptism service. For
many of us perhaps the best way forward
would be for there to be a general re-authorisation of the ASB service. If it
was good enough for attention to the seasonal variations in the prayer over
the water.
The
Easter/Pentecost Prayer essentially
reproduces the ASB Prayer. Following the Scott way it seems possible to keep
within the letter as well as the spirit of the law in using
ASB.
Easter/Pentecost Prayer essentially
reproduces the ASB Prayer. Following the Scott way it seems possible to keep
within the letter as well as the spirit of the law in using
ASB.
But
the more substantial objection to the Common Worship Baptism service remains. It
should not be necessary to use what might be called ‘the scissor and paste
method’ to deduce the doctrine of the Church of England. Unfortunately the
impression will remain in churches using undiluted Common Worship that we
Anglicans do hold to a doctrine of baptismal regeneration and that parents can
avoid the responsibility of believing by passing it on to the congregation”
.
The Revs Jeremy Collingwood and Steve Daughtery
To view the earlier pages - click on the boxes below
|
|